<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Creature of Habit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:35:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Exchange 2010 Rollup Pack 4 (and You)</title>
		<link>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/exchange-2010-rollup-pack-4</link>
		<comments>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/exchange-2010-rollup-pack-4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patches and Hotfixes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/?p=313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Update Rollup 4 for Exchange Server 2010 includes a great many fixes to errors big and small in Database Availability Groups, legacy Exchange 2003 migration scenarios, and a number of fairly irritating problems with OWA. What I&#8217;m most excited about (in other words, the problems that were most disruptive to my life) are these:</p>
<p>
979848  Event [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/exchange-2010-rollup-pack-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Error Importing Third-Party Certificate in Exchange 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/2010/05/error-importing-third-party-certificate-in-exchange-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/2010/05/error-importing-third-party-certificate-in-exchange-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 19:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Occasionally, Exchange Server 2010 admins may encounter the following error when attempting to import a certificate or complete a certificate request:</p>
<p>The certificate status could not be determined because the revocation check failed</p>
<p>This error is thrown when your Exchange server is unable to connect outward to the appropriate certificate authority&#8217;s certificate revocation list (CRL.) Microsoft&#8217;s KB article [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/2010/05/error-importing-third-party-certificate-in-exchange-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bug in Windows Aero May Allow Remote Exploit</title>
		<link>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/2010/05/windows-aero-bug/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/2010/05/windows-aero-bug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security & Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloatware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remote Exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Security Response Center is warning of a flaw in Windows 7-x64 and Windows Server 2008 R2-x64 that could permit remote code execution. Although the bug affects users of the &#8220;Aero&#8221; theme on either platform, since &#8220;Aero&#8221; is off by default in Windows 2008 Server R2, this is primarily a threat for Windows 7-x64, where it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/2010/05/windows-aero-bug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reliable Exchange 2010 DAG: Part 1, Active Directory Health</title>
		<link>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/2010/05/best-practices-exchange-2010-dag-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/2010/05/best-practices-exchange-2010-dag-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exchange Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Active Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High-Availability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the most awaited (and misunderstood) features added to Exchange Server 2010 is the disaster-recovery/high-availability feature known as the Database Availability Group (DAG.) Microsoft touts it as a perfected &#8220;2.0&#8243; of the heretofore painful database replication process known as Continuous Cluster Replication (CCR,) which came into our lives in Exchange 2007. While the DAG does [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/2010/05/best-practices-exchange-2010-dag-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strengthening Network Security on a Budget</title>
		<link>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/2010/04/strengthening-network-security-on-a-budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/2010/04/strengthening-network-security-on-a-budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security & Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>eWeek has taken on a topic near and dear to the SMB network administrator&#8217;s heart: How to improve network security on a budget.</p>
<p>Times are tough. The economy is down. Spending is controlled. And your budget is cut. Specifically, your security budget has been hacked to pieces because ROI for security is a pretty tough sell. As [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tommarsh.net/blog/2010/04/strengthening-network-security-on-a-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
